<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Providence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prussic.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prussic.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Ruminations on Theology and Personal Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chesterton&#8217;s The Man Who Knew Too Much by Kim Garner</title>
		<link>http://prussic.wordpress.com/2013/03/22/chestertons-the-man-who-knew-too-much/#comment-2711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim Garner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prussic.wordpress.com/?p=2161#comment-2711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t read anything else of his yet, unfortunately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read anything else of his yet, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Radicalism &#8211; Islamic or Otherwise by Reuben Barnett</title>
		<link>http://prussic.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/radicalism-islamic-or-otherwise/#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reuben Barnett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prussic.wordpress.com/?p=2175#comment-2706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[0] I&#039;ve chosen to not focus on any single published definition or explanation or model of radicalization — there are multiple. I&#039;m trying to focus on what they all hold in common: the focus on political, ideological, and historical factors terrorists cite as their justifications for resorting to violence. While these may be important, they are also abstractions, and are an incomplete explanation for terrorist violence of any sort.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[0] I&#8217;ve chosen to not focus on any single published definition or explanation or model of radicalization — there are multiple. I&#8217;m trying to focus on what they all hold in common: the focus on political, ideological, and historical factors terrorists cite as their justifications for resorting to violence. While these may be important, they are also abstractions, and are an incomplete explanation for terrorist violence of any sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Radicalism &#8211; Islamic or Otherwise by Trent</title>
		<link>http://prussic.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/radicalism-islamic-or-otherwise/#comment-2705</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prussic.wordpress.com/?p=2175#comment-2705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chesterton&#8217;s The Man Who Knew Too Much by Tim Prussic</title>
		<link>http://prussic.wordpress.com/2013/03/22/chestertons-the-man-who-knew-too-much/#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Prussic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prussic.wordpress.com/?p=2161#comment-2704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Kim! I&#039;ll keep it in mind. What else have you enjoyed from GKC?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Kim! I&#8217;ll keep it in mind. What else have you enjoyed from GKC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chesterton&#8217;s The Man Who Knew Too Much by Kim Garner</title>
		<link>http://prussic.wordpress.com/2013/03/22/chestertons-the-man-who-knew-too-much/#comment-2703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim Garner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 04:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prussic.wordpress.com/?p=2161#comment-2703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Blue Cross, one of Chesterton&#039;s Father Brown mysteries is quite enjoyable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Blue Cross, one of Chesterton&#8217;s Father Brown mysteries is quite enjoyable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Radicalism &#8211; Islamic or Otherwise by Ted</title>
		<link>http://prussic.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/radicalism-islamic-or-otherwise/#comment-2700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 14:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prussic.wordpress.com/?p=2175#comment-2700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Incur&quot; not &quot;in cut&quot; socialism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Incur&#8221; not &#8220;in cut&#8221; socialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Radicalism &#8211; Islamic or Otherwise by Ted</title>
		<link>http://prussic.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/radicalism-islamic-or-otherwise/#comment-2699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 14:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prussic.wordpress.com/?p=2175#comment-2699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is hard to imagine of all of the people of the time there aws no one ever attempting physical harm to Christ. No mention is made in the bible of any such assaults. Later among adoring crowds it would have been dangerous for any perpetrator. But I cant imagine Him not defending himself. He certainly had no trouble with money changers

But never did Christ attempt to organize others, in cut socialism, or talk violence to achieve goals. Nor did he leave a written game plan. It was left to others to document the ministry of Christ. Not so with Islam. It&#039;s  book was written for conquest of the world for the satiation of its author. In my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to imagine of all of the people of the time there aws no one ever attempting physical harm to Christ. No mention is made in the bible of any such assaults. Later among adoring crowds it would have been dangerous for any perpetrator. But I cant imagine Him not defending himself. He certainly had no trouble with money changers</p>
<p>But never did Christ attempt to organize others, in cut socialism, or talk violence to achieve goals. Nor did he leave a written game plan. It was left to others to document the ministry of Christ. Not so with Islam. It&#8217;s  book was written for conquest of the world for the satiation of its author. In my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sweet, Sweet Calvinization by Tim Prussic</title>
		<link>http://prussic.wordpress.com/2013/03/12/sweet-sweet-calvinization/#comment-2698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Prussic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 23:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prussic.wordpress.com/?p=2135#comment-2698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Purple and gold, baby... nice. I went to WWU in Bellingham. I think our colors were blue and white, but I was never quite sure.

Books on Calvinism, eh? There are probably plenty that would be good, but two come to mind. First, is The Five Points of Calvinism by David Steele et al. This book is &quot;narrow&quot; in the sense that it deals only with the much hated/loved Five Points. What it offers is 1) it&#039;s short and concise, 2) some historical context for the five pts, 3) plenty of Scripture from which these doctrines are drawn, and 4) a nice bibliography for further study.

Second book is Easy Chairs, Hard Words by Douglas Wilson. This book will be more engaging, as the author works through the process of coming first to understand what Calvinism was and then embracing it as biblical teaching. Wilson is typically easy and fun to read. 

Both of these books are small and cheap... two more things in their favor! I&#039;m very happy to be a sounding board for you as you work though these (and other) issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purple and gold, baby&#8230; nice. I went to WWU in Bellingham. I think our colors were blue and white, but I was never quite sure.</p>
<p>Books on Calvinism, eh? There are probably plenty that would be good, but two come to mind. First, is The Five Points of Calvinism by David Steele et al. This book is &#8220;narrow&#8221; in the sense that it deals only with the much hated/loved Five Points. What it offers is 1) it&#8217;s short and concise, 2) some historical context for the five pts, 3) plenty of Scripture from which these doctrines are drawn, and 4) a nice bibliography for further study.</p>
<p>Second book is Easy Chairs, Hard Words by Douglas Wilson. This book will be more engaging, as the author works through the process of coming first to understand what Calvinism was and then embracing it as biblical teaching. Wilson is typically easy and fun to read. </p>
<p>Both of these books are small and cheap&#8230; two more things in their favor! I&#8217;m very happy to be a sounding board for you as you work though these (and other) issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sweet, Sweet Calvinization by Brandon Gross</title>
		<link>http://prussic.wordpress.com/2013/03/12/sweet-sweet-calvinization/#comment-2697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon Gross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prussic.wordpress.com/?p=2135#comment-2697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You got me on the colors, although this must be a sub-conscious thought process as my active mind would choose purple and gold every time.

Yeah, the classical model is very intriguing to me, and something I felt BCS didn&#039;t do an adequate job of equipping me with (i.e. thinking). I assumed that my worldview was so strong, that I didn&#039;t need to equip myself in the process of understanding what others believe. Then came UW. 

Anyway, not sure how we are going to pay for private school yet, though, so we may find ourselves in homeschool model sooner than later.  Going to try and greatly simplify our lives to make this school happen, because who needs a bunch of crap in our houses anyway, right? 

With regard to Calvinism, would you be willing to suggest a few balanced (moderate) books on the subject. Given I&#039;m sending my kids to PCCS this year, it would be good for me to gain a better understanding of the topic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got me on the colors, although this must be a sub-conscious thought process as my active mind would choose purple and gold every time.</p>
<p>Yeah, the classical model is very intriguing to me, and something I felt BCS didn&#8217;t do an adequate job of equipping me with (i.e. thinking). I assumed that my worldview was so strong, that I didn&#8217;t need to equip myself in the process of understanding what others believe. Then came UW. </p>
<p>Anyway, not sure how we are going to pay for private school yet, though, so we may find ourselves in homeschool model sooner than later.  Going to try and greatly simplify our lives to make this school happen, because who needs a bunch of crap in our houses anyway, right? </p>
<p>With regard to Calvinism, would you be willing to suggest a few balanced (moderate) books on the subject. Given I&#8217;m sending my kids to PCCS this year, it would be good for me to gain a better understanding of the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sweet, Sweet Calvinization by Tim Prussic</title>
		<link>http://prussic.wordpress.com/2013/03/12/sweet-sweet-calvinization/#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Prussic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prussic.wordpress.com/?p=2135#comment-2696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay... just admit it, Brandon, you are deeply attracted to PCCS because their colors are blue and white, just like BCS&#039;s.

Glancing through PCCS&#039;s website, I like it a lot (said like Lloyd Christmas). ACCS is an excellent association. The classical model (based upon the trivium) seems very natural and logically oriented to the  developmental strengths of the students. 

We homeschool, but we hang everything on the classical model. Further, the driving notion of education as a major facet of discipleship is so vastly important, whether at home or in a day school. In this regard, PCCS looks great on paper. The struggle (again, at home or in school) is actually to DO it!

As to the Calvinism, hopefully PCCS is full of warm-hearted Calvinists. There are various subsections of Calvinism that are less than desirable. As to your specific theological/theoretical struggles with Reformed thought, I can certainly understand. I&#039;d encourage you to read broadly in the Reformed tradition. I think you&#039;ll find that process to be both edifying and enlightening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay&#8230; just admit it, Brandon, you are deeply attracted to PCCS because their colors are blue and white, just like BCS&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Glancing through PCCS&#8217;s website, I like it a lot (said like Lloyd Christmas). ACCS is an excellent association. The classical model (based upon the trivium) seems very natural and logically oriented to the  developmental strengths of the students. </p>
<p>We homeschool, but we hang everything on the classical model. Further, the driving notion of education as a major facet of discipleship is so vastly important, whether at home or in a day school. In this regard, PCCS looks great on paper. The struggle (again, at home or in school) is actually to DO it!</p>
<p>As to the Calvinism, hopefully PCCS is full of warm-hearted Calvinists. There are various subsections of Calvinism that are less than desirable. As to your specific theological/theoretical struggles with Reformed thought, I can certainly understand. I&#8217;d encourage you to read broadly in the Reformed tradition. I think you&#8217;ll find that process to be both edifying and enlightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>